There has been nothing separating B2B integration from the legacy Internal Integration architectures which include load extract, load ETL and enterprise service bus (ESB). It’s important to inquire if the natural technological forces together with the emerging business applications have played a part in disregarding B2B integration and legacy internal integration architectures. It’s also important to examine which architecture model remains relevant and that which is endangered by the changing trends in technology. And also what architecture model has evolved to challenge the existing three.
These questions are important to put into consideration but it’s also important to consider that the ability of an integration architecture to survive depends on other factors other than relying on just thinking. It’s a significant issue, therefore, to put into account while selecting technologies, seller partners and also placement options.
Merchants form both the ESB and ETL sell software especially the on-premises software. A section of them sells cloud-based software versions that are known as the integration platform as a service (iPaaS). B2B integration merchants most often place and sustain the B2B networks. Similar to the service level agreements that offers managed services comprehensively. Even if ETL, ESB, iPaaS and B2B architectures explicit similar characteristics as they try to stay relevant to the dynamic technological trends. Software development is ideally unique compared to the operating B2B networks.
There are some factors that have transformed the application integration platform for a period of over 15 years. These forces are credited to the changes witnessed in the B2B integration.B2B integration is a term used to denote the automation, optimization, and integration of the significant business procedures that spread past the four walks of a given organization.A2A which is the use case for other integration architectures including ESB and ETL has over time been used to give description of the automation, integration and the optimization of significant business procedures that takes place in an organization. In most cases, A2A integration stretches to incorporate those applications that fall in a similar application landscape. It is therefore not advisable to consider some B2B integration and eventually causing harm to the uninformed customers together with the committed ESB vendors.
Then what makes B2B integration look similar to the A2A integration? It is because the business practitioners together with the technological partners are confusing their apparent differences.
To begin with, as companies big and small began out contracting some of their business process such as R&D, HR etc., so as to give priority to their basic competencies. This has led to the distribution of more enterprises which were integrated. Mutual ventures, partnerships, complex networks, and distribution chain have replaced formerly vertically integrated systems. Therefore, the traditional definition comparing A2A/ESB from B2B which was inclined on the principles of “within a company” and “within the four walls of a company” is not now viable because the realm of a company has changed.
In the past, it was possible to access a data center with the help of a VP from a corporate IT who would show the storage arrays, rack of servers, the loads of Cat 5 Cables and the exact rack of DMZ servers which in other terms is called the “firewalls”. The mainstreaming of the distributed data centers offered by Amazon’s AWS, SaaS and most recently cloud applications have put to an end ancient data management methods which were hinged to a notion of “behind the corporate firewall”. However, when the term ESB is searched, it still means “behind the firewall” distinction, 14 years after it was formulated.
In the past, companies were a limited entity characterized with distinctive firewall, integrated data, and applications. Today, companies have changed and adopted distribution, diversification and also they offer a variety of products to consumers. These changes have been attributed to the B2B network suppliers more than the ESB merchants.
All the diversification is interweaved together by the B2B integration providers who have addressed information flows, managed payload sizes, provided reliable system availability, provided operational discipline and secure data at rest or in transit.
ESB solutions used now has similarities with the B2B, ESB and ETL architectures. Several ETL/ESB solutions have assumed a peculiar unconnected features in order to survive to the technological changes. These distinct features consist of applications on social media (e.g. TIBCO timber), disjointed master data management (MDM) e.g. Velasel and Siperian and analytic and reporting bolt-ons (e.g. the TIBCO spotfire).